INDEPENDENT RESEARCH INITIATIVE

Naldanga Rajbari
Research Initiative

A focused project documenting the Naldanga Estate, intermediary regional authority and governance in Bengal through archival, legal-historical, spatial and local evidence.

PROJECT IDENTITY

Research-led, independent and evidence-conscious.

The initiative is founded and led by Md Imdadul Haque Sohag. It provides a stable home for related working papers, repository records and independently published coverage, while keeping each kind of evidence clearly separated.

It is presented as an independent research initiative—not as a university, degree-granting body, peer-review journal or claim of institutional endorsement.

FOUNDERMd Imdadul Haque Sohag
STATUSIndependent research initiative
PRIMARY SCOPENaldanga Estate and regional authority in Bengal
RESEARCH IDENTITYORCID 0009-0000-9580-536X

CORE RECORDS

Research record

All research →

These are repository-hosted working papers. A DOI or repository listing provides a persistent record; it does not, by itself, establish peer review.

01 · SSRN 6539038
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.6539038

Reassessing Regional Authority in Mughal Bengal: A Spatial, Legal, and Historiographical Analysis of the Naldanga Estate within Mahmudshahi Pargana

A working paper examining the estate through spatial, legal and historiographical evidence.

Open record ↗
02 · SSRN 6548259
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.6548259

Naldanga Rajya: Reconstructing a Regional Polity Beyond the Zamindari Framework in Pre-Colonial Bengal

A working-paper record on intermediary authority and institutional structure beyond a simplified zamindari classification.

Open record ↗
03 · SSRN 6901999
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.6901999

Intermediary Authority and Zamindari Governance in Pre-Colonial Bengal: A Micro-historical Study of Naldanga Rajya

A micro-historical working paper co-authored with Badal Ghosh.

Open record ↗

ADDITIONAL REPOSITORY RECORD

Zenodo

A related Naldanga research deposit is preserved at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20336868.

Open DOI ↗

EVIDENCE STANDARD

One entity, distinct evidence layers.

Project identity, authored research and third-party coverage are linked but not conflated.

Repository placement is described accurately; media coverage and tertiary-source use are recorded as evidence of public use, not academic validation.